Indian security agencies worse than nigerian fraudsters falsely claiming google, tata sponsored goan call girls sunaina chodan, siddhi mandrekar offering sex services to them, indore document robber housewife veena , school dropouts like gujju housewife naina, cheater housewives nayanshree hathwar, riddhi nayak, asmita patel, ruchika and other fraud raw/cbi employees who have never invested any money in domains in their life, own the domains of a private citizen, single woman engineer in the greatest financial, online fraud in the world which started in 2010
Real domain investors are paying the market price of the domains and getting them legally transferred in their name, paying the domain renewal expenses annually, however indian security agencies are the greatest online domain fraudsters in the world, taking sex, money, job bribes and making completely fake claims that google, tata sponsored cheater housewives, sex workers, school dropouts, document robbers and other fraud raw/cbi employees who do not spend any money online, own the domains of a private citizen. They are also defaming, cheating and exploiting the real domain investor who is spending her money on domain names
If the indian security agencies were really honest, they would asked the frauds who they have got R&AW/cbi jobs to purchase the domain names legally which is the standard practice worldwide, 8 years is a long time to legally purchase the domain names, paying the market price. However bribed by google, tata, cheaters like deepika padukone look alike indore document robber R&AW employee housewife veena, the extremely shameless fraud indian security agencies are far worse than the saudi jamal khashoggi killers making completely fake claims about domain, website ownership
“Mere words are not enough evidence” to dispute the allegations that Khashoggi had been killed, Erdogan the Turkish president was quoted in Middleeasteye.co.uk and this domain investor would like to tell the same to the security agencies,ntro, raw, cbi employees who falsely claim that they and their associates own this website, when they cannot provide any evidence at all.